An examination of the existence of a morally perfect omniscient omnipotent being

As an omnipotent and omniscient being, can create beings whose actions he can neither control nor predict of whether a benevolent god, although not the specificcausal agent of evil, remains culpable on grounds of moral negligence. Omnipotent: god is perfect in that he can do all things consistent with the perfection of his being god cannot do the self-contradictory (eg, make a rock he cannot lift), nor can he do that which is contrary to his perfect nature (eg, he cannot change, he cannot lie, etc. The problem of evil is very simple: why would evil exist if there were an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent and all perfect god evil has been a major obstacle for those who hold tough faith in a higher being. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of god that uses ontologymany arguments fall under the category of the ontological, and they tend to involve arguments about the state of being or existing more specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with an a priori theory about the organization of the universe.

an examination of the existence of a morally perfect omniscient omnipotent being If an omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfectly good being existed at any time earlier than now, that being had the power to bring it about that no omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfectly good being exists now, and that being knew that it had that power.

The impossibility of an omnipotent omniscient god among the most telling atheistic arguments are those to the effect that the existence of any being that meets standard divine specifications is impossible - that there not only is not but could not be any such being. Theism the condition of humans is the result of an omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect being 3being massively irregular is a defect in a world, a defect at least as great as the defect of containing and, if 1–3 are true, then the existence of suffering is not incompatible with the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and. Our reasons to believe scripture passage for today is john 14:6 it reads, jesus saith unto him, i am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the father, but by me our reasons to.

I have argued that the hypothesis h 1, the existence of the absolute evil one, a being that is omnipotent, omniscient free and perfectly evil is coherent if theism is so if swinburne's argument is accepted, then the simplicity of h 1 and h 2 are the same and consequently the prior probability is the same. The omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect god that bertrand russell critiqued in “is there a god” was not the jewish god it was the god of the ontological argument, a god that arose without reference to either scripture or empirical reality, like a celestial teapot from the mind of anselm ( c 1033 – 21 april 1109) the first of. Any version of the argument from evil claims that there is some fact concerning the evil in the world such that the existence of god—understood as at least a very powerful, very knowledgeable, and morally very good person, and, ideally, as an omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect person—is either logically precluded, or rendered.

In fact, a morally perfect being cannot treat evil and good the same way, as that would be unjust but why would an omnipotent being allow evil to exist in the first place because it serves a higher good. Concept of god-necessary existence, a being is maximally excellent in a world w if and only if it is omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect in w get his argument from the slides online 1 omnipotent, and morally perfect being powerful objection to the argument. The anthropic argument states that if god is omniscient, omnipotent, and morally perfect, he would have created other morally perfect beings instead of imperfect humans inductive arguments the atheist-existential argument for the non-existence of a perfect sentient being states that if existence precedes essence , it follows from the meaning. A game-theoretical analysis of interactions between a human being and an omnipotent and omniscient godlike being highlights the inherent unknowability of the latter's superiority in divine games , steven brams analyzes games that a human being might play with an omnipotent and omniscient godlike being.

An examination of the existence of a morally perfect omniscient omnipotent being

an examination of the existence of a morally perfect omniscient omnipotent being If an omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfectly good being existed at any time earlier than now, that being had the power to bring it about that no omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfectly good being exists now, and that being knew that it had that power.

The problem of evil is the problem of rationally reconciling the belief that an omnipotent, omniscient and morally perfect being exists, the belief that evil occurs, and the acceptance of an adequate normative theory. Being omnipotent, god has power over wind, water, gravity, physics, etc god's power is infinite, or limitless omniscience means all-knowing god is all all-knowing in the sense that he is aware. With (1), (3), and (4) taken collectively, you receive the conclusion that such a being who is omniscient, omnipotent and morally perfect actually exists i think the argument becomes interesting once we consider (3) and (4) as consequences of a definition plantinga explains. Philosophy of religion concept of god god as an omniscient, omnipotent, supremely good, eternal and everlasting being and what this means omniscience god is an all-knowing being omnipotent, then god has the power to eliminate evil if god is omniscient, then god knows when evil exists if god is morally perfect, then god has the.

  • The kalam and fine-tuning arguments imply the existence of an enormously powerful and intelligent being, but not an omnipotent or omniscient being the moral argument can be augmented to lead to the conclusion that god, as the ground of objective moral value, is morally perfect, but that is not the conclusion of the argument itself.
  • 1 introduction my first nine arguments concluded to the existence of god: at least one immaterial being who is omnipotent, omniscient.

The thrust of the argument, in effect', is that if you consider something like the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect being, there are other types of omnipotent. However, the absence of evidence for an omnipotent, omniscient god is sufficient to deny that an omnipotent, omniscient exists, because an omnipotent, omniscient god is an unnecessary assumption and as such can be denied in the lack of evidence. This argument says that if god is morally perfect, omniscient and omnipotent, than instead of imperfect human beings, he would have created other morally perfect beings (john shook, 2011) inductive arguments.

an examination of the existence of a morally perfect omniscient omnipotent being If an omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfectly good being existed at any time earlier than now, that being had the power to bring it about that no omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfectly good being exists now, and that being knew that it had that power. an examination of the existence of a morally perfect omniscient omnipotent being If an omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfectly good being existed at any time earlier than now, that being had the power to bring it about that no omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfectly good being exists now, and that being knew that it had that power. an examination of the existence of a morally perfect omniscient omnipotent being If an omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfectly good being existed at any time earlier than now, that being had the power to bring it about that no omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfectly good being exists now, and that being knew that it had that power.
An examination of the existence of a morally perfect omniscient omnipotent being
Rated 4/5 based on 31 review

2018.